Innovation, artificial intelligence and automation: student perceptions on the future of work at the National University, University of Costa Rica, Technical University of Costa Rica and State Distance University

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70208/3007.8245.v6.n1.330

Keywords:

technological innovation, automation, higher education, digital revolution, digital skills

Abstract

Introduction: The rapid integration of technological innovation into everyday life, along with the growing presence of artificial intelligence and automation in the labor market, has generated increasing levels of uncertainty about the future of many professions - particularly among working university students. In the Costa Rican context, these transformations pose significant challenges for higher education, as they demand training aligned with dynamic, highly digitalized professional environments. This study examines the perceptions of students from public universities in Costa Rica, considering the impact of technological advances on their professional trajectories, their level of preparedness, and the strategies they have adopted to cope with these changes. Methodology: The study followed a quantitative approach using a non-experimental, descriptive, cross-sectional design. The sample consisted of 176 regularly enrolled, working students from four public universities in Costa Rica. A structured questionnaire with Likert-type scales was administered through Google Forms. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistical methods with the SPSS statistical software. Results and Discussion: The findings reveal a high level of concern regarding the possible replacement of professional roles due to automation. In addition, participants reported a moderate perception that their university education may be insufficient to fully adapt to rapid technological change. At the same time, there was strong participation in complementary training activities. This combination suggests a perceived gap between the formal curriculum and current labor market demands, alongside a proactive response grounded in continuous learning. Conclusions: The results portray a student profile that is aware, motivated, and adaptable, yet exposed to inequalities in digital preparation. The study concludes that Costa Rican public universities should strengthen advanced digital literacy and update their curricula accordingly. Furthermore, they should develop continuing education strategies that help reduce existing gaps and promote equitable and sustainable workforce integration in the digital era.

References

Acemoglu, D. y Restrepo, P. (2020). Robots and Jobs. Evidence from US labor markets. Journal of Political Economy. 128(6). 2188–2244. https://doi.org/10.1086/705716

Ahsan, K. Akbar, S. Kam, B. y Abdulrahman, M. (2023). Implementation of micro credentials in higher education. A systematic literature review. Education and Information Technologies, 28, 13505–13540. https://doi.org/10.1007/s1063902311739z

Baek, Y., Lee, S., Choo, J., Kim, J. y Yoo, K. (2022). Association between workers’ anxiety over technological automation and sleep disturbance. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 19(16). 10051. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191610051

Barycka, E. Florczyk, A. y Kuna, P. (2023). Micro credentials as a tool for upskilling and reskilling in the digital economy. A systematic literature review. Journal of Adult and Continuing Education. 29(1). 67 89. https://acortar.link/cCYknE

Brougham, D. y Haar, J. (2018). Smart Technology, Artificial Intelligence, Robotics, and Algorithms (STARA). Employees’ perceptions of our future workplace. Journal of Management y Organization. 24(2). 239 257.

Cabero Almenara, J. Guillén Gámez, F. Ruiz Palmero, J. y Palacios Rodríguez, A. (2021). Digital competence of higher education professors according to DigCompEdu. Education and Information Technologies. 26(4). 4691–4708. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639021104765

Cabrera Solano, P. Quinonez Beltran, A. y Ochoa Cueva, C. (2023). Digital Competence in Higher Education. A Systematic review of the Literature from 2015 2022. International Journal of Learning. Teaching and Educational Research. 22(1). 19 38. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1321030.pdf

Choi, T. y Leigh, N. (2024). Artificial intelligence’s creation and displacement of labor demand. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 209. 123824. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123824

Gamage, K., y Dehideniya, S. (2025). Unlocking career potential: How micro credentials are revolutionising higher education and lifelong learning. Education Sciences, 15(5), 525. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15050525

Hernández Sampieri, R., y Mendoza, C. (2018). Metodología de la investigación: Las rutas cuantitativa, cualitativa y mixta. McGraw Hill Education.

Inamorato dos Santos, A., Chinkes, E., Carvalho, M., Solórzano, C., y Marroni, L. (2023). Strategies to develop digital competencies in higher education: A literature review. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 20, 201–220. https://acortar.link/1VgbMg

Jeffrey, H., y Matakos, K. (2024). Automation, anxiety, fairness perceptions, and redistribution. Journal of Economic Behavior y Organization, 221, 174–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2024.02.038

Li, J., y Huang, J. (2020). Dimensions of artificial intelligence anxiety based on integrated fear acquisition theory. Technology in Society, 63, 101410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101410

López Nuñez, J., Alonso García, S., Berral Ortiz, B., y Victoria Maldonado, J. (2024). A systematic review of digital competence evaluation in higher education. Education Sciences, 14(11), 1181. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14111181

Nazareno, J., y Schiff, D. (2021). The impact of automation and artificial intelligence on worker well being. Technology in Society, 67, 101679. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101679

OECD. (2022). Skills for digital transition: Assessing recent trends using big data. OECD Publishing.

Schwabe, H., y Castellacci, F. (2020). Automation, workers’ skills and job satisfaction. PLOS ONE, 15(11), e0242929. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0242929

Taherdoost. H. (2016). Sampling Methods in Research Methodology. How to Choose a Sampling Technique for Research. International Jour. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3205035

Włoch, R., Kucharski, M., y Legutko, A. (2024). Who’s afraid of automation? Examining determinants of fear of automation in six European countries. Technology in Society, 81, 102782. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2024.102782

World Economic Forum. (2020). The Future of Jobs Report 2020. Geneva. https://n9.cl/ugktx

Neri Tapia, L., Mortis Lozoya, S. y Escudero Nahón, A. (2023). Competencia digital en estudiantes universitarios: Una revisión sistemática. https://n9.cl/pnqefo

Romero Díaz de la Guardia, J. Olmos Gómez, M. y García Garnica, M. (2024). Habilidades para el futuro laboral. Un modelo basado en pensamiento crítico en estudiantes de formación profesional y bachillerato. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=9950224

Published

2026-02-17

How to Cite

Chaves Jaén, C., & Chanto Espinoza, C. (2026). Innovation, artificial intelligence and automation: student perceptions on the future of work at the National University, University of Costa Rica, Technical University of Costa Rica and State Distance University. Horizonte Academico, 6(1), 96–110. https://doi.org/10.70208/3007.8245.v6.n1.330

Issue

Section

Artículos